Huzzah!
Most Secret, my historical
romance set in the days leading up to the 1745 Jacobite Rebellion, recently won Third
Place in the Historical division of the Oklahoma Romance Writers of America
International Digital Awards.
In celebration whereof, I’m sharing one of the very, very
few 18th century recipes that use chocolate. They drank
chocolate, of course, but they seldom used it otherwise: no one ate bon-bons or
devil’s food cake or chocolate chip cookies in the 18th century or
indeed, well into the 19th century. What made our chocolate candy
and cake possible was the invention in 1828 of the Dutch process for treating
cacao beans, which greatly facilitated the use of chocolate by reducing the acidity
of the beans and increasing solubility.
Chocolate-Cream
From The Compleat Confectioner, by Mrs. Eales, Confectioner
to King William and Queen Ann, Third Edition, 1742
Take a quarter pound of chocolate, breaking it into a
quarter of a pint of boiling water; mill (i.e., beat) it and boil it until all
the chocolate is dissolved; then put to it a pint of cream and two eggs well
beaten; let it boil, milling it all the while; when it is cold, mill it again,
that it may go up with a froth.
The chocolate used must have been “drinking chocolate”, sold
in tablets, introduced in England in 1674, consisting of roasted, shelled,
crushed cacao beans which were ground to a gritty powder, to which were added
sugar and spices.
The closest I could come to 18th
century chocolate tablets was Mexican chocolate tablets sold to make
Mexican-style hot chocolate. They contain sugar and cinnamon and are much more
brittle than our baking chocolate.
I used two large eggs; 18th century eggs would
have been smaller; a little smaller than our “Small” eggs, which are supposed
to average out to 1.5 ounces. Going by the traditional pound cake recipe dating at least to the 18th century of one pound each of flour, sugar
and eggs, eggs of the period must have averaged about 1.33 ounces
each.
The result was softer than modern mousse, possibly because
of the larger eggs, or maybe because I don’t have a kitchen maid to beat the
mixture for an extended period. I may not have boiled it as long as I should,
either. But it was quite tasty. When I try it again, I’ll address those issues.
No comments:
Post a Comment